Houma vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,443,612 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 25.9 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $116,328, a difference of 61.4%), per capita income ($32,996 compared to $53,154, a difference of 61.1%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $120,487, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $54,389, a difference of 22.6%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $63,939, a difference of 26.5%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $53,334, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Russian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 96.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 90.3%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 88.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 34.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.9%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 66.1%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.8%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 185.7%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 166.3%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 147.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 83.7%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 70.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.0%).