Ghanaian vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,078,655 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.080% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 79.7 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,164 compared to $53,154, a difference of 26.1%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $110,398, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $54,389, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $44,169, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $67,626, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 44.7%), family poverty (10.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.5%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.14%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.12, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.3%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Russian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.1%).