Immigrants from Asia vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,839,698 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $53,154, a difference of 6.9%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $54,389, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($53,310 compared to $53,334, a difference of 0.040%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $67,626, a difference of 0.050%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $44,169, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.1%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 8.7%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.58%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.0%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.3%).