Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ghanaians

Immigrants from Norway

Fair
Good
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Norway Integration in Ghanaian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,715,191 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 42.2 Immigrants from Norway.
Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,164 compared to $52,217, a difference of 23.8%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $106,629, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $50,984, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $42,837, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $66,118, a difference of 10.1%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Income
Income MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Norway
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,164
Exceptional
$52,217
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,877
Exceptional
$115,847
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,582
Exceptional
$94,846
Median Earnings
Average
$46,440
Exceptional
$51,758
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,810
Exceptional
$61,628
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,429
Exceptional
$42,837
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,594
Tragic
$50,984
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,137
Exceptional
$106,629
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,277
Exceptional
$111,669
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,043
Exceptional
$66,118
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
27.3%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 39.0%), family poverty (10.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.23%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty
Poverty MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Norway
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.0%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Norway
Unemployment
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.3%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Norway
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Poor
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Poor
35.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Fair
82.5%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.5%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Norway
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
29.9%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.0%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Norway
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.0%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
6.1%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.4%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.79%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level
Education Level MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Norway
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.4%
Exceptional
64.7%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
52.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Exceptional
44.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.4%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Norway Disability
Disability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Norway
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Average
11.3%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.1%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%