Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Norway

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Norway Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,066,308 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 32.9 Immigrants from Norway.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $52,217, a difference of 40.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $106,629, a difference of 31.9%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $115,847, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.42%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,984, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $66,118, a difference of 22.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Norway
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$52,217
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$115,847
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$94,846
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$51,758
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$61,628
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$42,837
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$50,984
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$106,629
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$111,669
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$66,118
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 34.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Norway
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Norway
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Norway
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Poor
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Poor
35.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Fair
82.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.3%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 22.5%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.54%), currently married (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Norway
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 21.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Norway
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
6.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 82.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 65.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Norway
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
64.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
52.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
44.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 45.7%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.3%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Norway Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Norway
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Average
11.3%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%