Immigrants from Egypt vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,518,953 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Egypt communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Egypt within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Egypt corresponds to an increase of 65.9 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,361 compared to $52,217, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,239 compared to $50,984, a difference of 6.4%), and wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $42,837, a difference of 0.0%), median household income ($93,700 compared to $94,846, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,941 compared to $111,669, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 16.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.57%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.79%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.3%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.71%).