Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,425,671 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 52.8 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $52,217, a difference of 38.5%), median family income ($88,034 compared to $115,847, a difference of 31.6%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $61,628, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $50,984, a difference of 4.8%), median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $42,837, a difference of 19.2%), and wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 80.7%), receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 70.2%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 5.7%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.0%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.0%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.14, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 65.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.0%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.3%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.5%).