Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,595,853 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $50,984, a difference of 10.2%), per capita income ($47,489 compared to $52,217, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $106,629, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $42,837, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($50,274 compared to $51,758, a difference of 2.9%), and median household income ($91,446 compared to $94,846, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.7%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and single female poverty (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.99%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 9.8%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.54%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.96%).