Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,267,129 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $52,217, a difference of 15.5%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $61,628, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $106,629, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $66,118, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,984, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $42,837, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.42%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.2%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.95%), currently married (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.6%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.5%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.28%), male disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%).