Immigrants from Korea vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,345,757 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Korea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Korea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Korea corresponds to an increase of 9.2 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,716 compared to $50,984, a difference of 9.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,243 compared to $111,669, a difference of 8.6%), and median household income ($102,962 compared to $94,846, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($51,671 compared to $52,217, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($44,847 compared to $42,837, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 23.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.44%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.41%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 14.0%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and bachelor's degree (47.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (90.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.33%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.9%).