Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Norway

Poor
Good
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Norway Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,495,037 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 50.0 Immigrants from Norway.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $52,217, a difference of 70.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,669, a difference of 52.2%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $94,846, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,984, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,837, a difference of 21.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $106,629, a difference of 28.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Norway
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$52,217
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$115,847
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$94,846
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$51,758
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$61,628
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$42,837
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Tragic
$50,984
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$106,629
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$111,669
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$66,118
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
27.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 148.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 127.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 98.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 32.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Norway
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 156.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 119.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 119.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Norway
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Good
5.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 7.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Norway
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Poor
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Poor
35.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Fair
82.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 105.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 71.9%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Norway
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
29.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.5%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Norway
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Fair
6.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 103.5%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 91.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Norway
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
64.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
52.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
44.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 77.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Norway Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Norway
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Average
11.3%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%