Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Norway
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Norway
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Norway Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,805,100 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Norway.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $52,217, a difference of 43.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $106,629, a difference of 36.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $111,669, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.51%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,984, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $66,118, a difference of 23.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Norway |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $52,217 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $115,847 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $94,846 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $51,758 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $61,628 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $42,837 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,984 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $106,629 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $111,669 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $66,118 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 34.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Norway |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Average 29.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.070%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.61%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Norway |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Norway |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Poor 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Fair 82.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Norway |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Average 46.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 47.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Norway |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Poor 19.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 78.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Norway |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 70.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 64.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 52.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 44.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.4%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Norway |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Average 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |