Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,009,575 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.740. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,950 compared to $52,217, a difference of 21.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $106,629, a difference of 18.0%), and wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $50,984, a difference of 0.74%), median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $42,837, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $66,118, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.2%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.51%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.48%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.7%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.7%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.50%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.98%).