Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,797,710 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 127.6 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $52,217, a difference of 10.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $106,629, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $50,984, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $42,837, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $66,118, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.30%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.34%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.74%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.0%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.4%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.9%).