Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,548,050 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,152 compared to $52,217, a difference of 30.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $106,629, a difference of 26.6%), and median family income ($93,748 compared to $115,847, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $50,984, a difference of 4.7%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $42,837, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $66,118, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 40.4%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.92%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and single male poverty (13.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.2%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.6%).