Australian vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,870,423 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 61.6 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and British communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $46,571, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $98,359, a difference of 9.7%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $108,705, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,477, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $63,940, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and British communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 33.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.0%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (91.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and British communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%).