Laotian vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,897,693 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of British within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.745. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 159.5 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and British communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 9.6%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $88,914, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $98,359, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,041 compared to $46,571, a difference of 1.0%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $57,890, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $63,940, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and British communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.90%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and British communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.5%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.9%).