French Canadian vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 480,382,612 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 30.1 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $63,940, a difference of 10.3%), per capita income ($43,003 compared to $46,571, a difference of 8.3%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $88,914, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,477, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $39,772, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.1%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.07 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.24%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.3%).