Lumbee vs British Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
British
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lumbee

British

Poor
Good
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,012
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
92nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

British Integration in Lumbee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,974,316 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of British within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.396. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 British.
Lumbee Integration in British Communities

Lumbee vs British Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and British communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $106,264, a difference of 63.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $98,359, a difference of 63.1%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $88,914, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $39,772, a difference of 22.4%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $48,189, a difference of 30.7%), and wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 35.5%).
Lumbee vs British Income
Income MetricLumbeeBritish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,845
Exceptional
$46,571
Median Family Income
Tragic
$68,679
Exceptional
$108,705
Median Household Income
Tragic
$54,644
Exceptional
$88,914
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,876
Exceptional
$48,189
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,715
Exceptional
$57,890
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,500
Average
$39,772
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$34,584
Poor
$51,477
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$60,305
Excellent
$98,359
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$65,113
Exceptional
$106,264
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$40,550
Exceptional
$63,940
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Tragic
28.9%

Lumbee vs British Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and British communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 135.4%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 114.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 113.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 48.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 50.3%), and single female poverty (33.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 56.4%).
Lumbee vs British Poverty
Poverty MetricLumbeeBritish
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
33.3%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
33.0%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
28.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.2%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Lumbee vs British Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 82.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 75.1%), and male unemployment (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.0%).
Lumbee vs British Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLumbeeBritish
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.8%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.0%

Lumbee vs British Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 9.3%).
Lumbee vs British Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLumbeeBritish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.8%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.6%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
40.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
65.5%
Exceptional
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.3%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.3%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.6%
Fair
82.6%

Lumbee vs British Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and British communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 57.4%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 56.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Lumbee vs British Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLumbeeBritish
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
48.2%
Good
30.8%

Lumbee vs British Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 36.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 7.5%).
Lumbee vs British Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLumbeeBritish
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.9%
Exceptional
60.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.1%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%

Lumbee vs British Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 104.4%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 99.0%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
Lumbee vs British Education Level
Education Level MetricLumbeeBritish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
87.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.9%
Exceptional
62.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.1%
Exceptional
2.2%

Lumbee vs British Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and British communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.6%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.3%).
Lumbee vs British Disability
Disability MetricLumbeeBritish
Disability
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.6%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.7%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.5%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%