Houma vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,324,474 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of British within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 22.1 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and British communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $106,264, a difference of 47.4%), median family income ($76,188 compared to $108,705, a difference of 42.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $63,940, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $57,890, a difference of 14.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $51,477, a difference of 16.1%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $48,189, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and British communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 84.5%), single male poverty (23.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 75.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 75.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 26.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 39.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 80.0%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 47.6%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 51.1%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 51.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 46.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 36.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 127.1%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 126.3%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 107.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 60.7%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.8%).