Immigrants from Russia vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,500,139 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 15.1 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and British communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $39,772, a difference of 12.3%), per capita income ($52,044 compared to $46,571, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $48,189, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $63,940, a difference of 0.90%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $106,264, a difference of 6.5%), and median family income ($116,942 compared to $108,705, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and British communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 25.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and British communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.9%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.97%), family households (63.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 98.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 8.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.1%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%).