Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,065,957 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of British within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.745. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.599% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 598.6 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and British communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $46,571, a difference of 11.2%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $39,772, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $98,359, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $63,940, a difference of 3.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $106,264, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $51,477, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and British communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.97%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and British communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.27%), currently married (48.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 55.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.7%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.14%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.0%).