Immigrants from Laos vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,544,839 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 18.2 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and British communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $46,571, a difference of 23.0%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $108,705, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,477, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $39,772, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $48,189, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and British communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 41.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.2%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.040%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.1%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and British communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.13, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.77%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 107.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.96%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%).