Alaska Native vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,909,601 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.663. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 47.6 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and British communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 18.3%), per capita income ($39,558 compared to $46,571, a difference of 17.7%), and median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $57,890, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $39,772, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $51,477, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $63,940, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and British communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 60.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.2%), and family poverty (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and British communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 67.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 66.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and British communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.2%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.9%), and births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (45.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 129.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and British communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 45.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 97.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 33.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.27%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.6%).