Native/Alaskan vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,448,437 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and British communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $46,571, a difference of 39.9%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $108,705, a difference of 34.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $106,264, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $51,477, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $39,772, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and British communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 90.3%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 80.0%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 23.0%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 66.6%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 60.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and British communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.9%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 39.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 38.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 70.3%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 65.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and British communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.1%).