Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Whites/Caucasians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,956 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.564% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 564.1 Whites/Caucasians.
Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $98,091, a difference of 19.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $91,668, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $82,029, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,531, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,847, a difference of 9.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.5% |
Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.7%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Poor 33.3% |
Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.90%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |