Pima vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Whites/Caucasians
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,061 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.523% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 522.6 Whites/Caucasians.
Pima vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $42,180, a difference of 37.7%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $98,091, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,336, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,531, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $91,668, a difference of 10.7%).
Income Metric | Pima | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 28.5% |
Pima vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 136.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 109.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 108.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 23.8%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.3%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 33.6%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 11.1% |
Pima vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 153.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Pima vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 11.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
Pima vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 74.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 54.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Poor 33.3% |
Pima vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 100.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Pima vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 52.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 49.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Pima vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 59.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 56.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.77%).
Disability Metric | Pima | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |