Finnish vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Finnish
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Finns
Whites/Caucasians
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Finnish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,917,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.156% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 156.5 Whites/Caucasians.
Finnish vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $91,668, a difference of 3.2%), per capita income ($43,461 compared to $42,180, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $50,336, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.26%), householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $58,847, a difference of 1.2%), and median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $53,925, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Finnish | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,461 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,676 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,607 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,940 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,721 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,173 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,827 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,610 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,904 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,535 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Tragic 28.5% |
Finnish vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.9%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.030%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Finnish | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Poor 21.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.2% | Excellent 11.1% |
Finnish vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and female unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.84%).
Unemployment Metric | Finnish | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Finnish vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.97%).
Labor Participation Metric | Finnish | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.9% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.7% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
Finnish vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.6%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.31%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.94%).
Family Structure Metric | Finnish | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.1% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.09 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Finnish vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.71%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.87%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Finnish | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.3% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Finnish vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.7%), associate's degree (46.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and college, 1 year or more (60.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Finnish | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.4% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.9% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.3% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.7% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.2% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Finnish vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Finnish | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |