Houma vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,799,095 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.206% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 206.4 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $98,091, a difference of 36.1%), wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $58,847, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $53,925, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $50,336, a difference of 13.5%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $45,197, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 66.7%), single male poverty (23.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 61.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 69.0%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.7%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 40.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.98%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 62.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 40.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 83.8%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 83.3%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 74.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 48.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.1%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.4%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.9%).