Immigrants from Grenada vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,201,908 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.526% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 1,525.5 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 76.3%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $58,847, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $98,091, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,596 compared to $45,197, a difference of 0.88%), per capita income ($41,123 compared to $42,180, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $91,668, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 60.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 57.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.56%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 53.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 50.9%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 62.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.5%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.14, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 432.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 169.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 148.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 48.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 112.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 148.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 69.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 0.84%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 75.9%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 68.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.7%).