Latvian vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,726,114 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.734% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,734.3 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $42,180, a difference of 24.8%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $99,800, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $91,668, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,336, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $58,847, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 24.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 20.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 39.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 53.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.7%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.3%).