Arapaho vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,779,951 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.466. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.652% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 652.0 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $42,180, a difference of 30.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $98,091, a difference of 29.2%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $53,925, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $58,847, a difference of 0.91%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $50,336, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $37,531, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 51.4%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 7.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 127.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 125.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 123.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 41.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.14, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 41.7%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.82%), female disability (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.5%).