Native/Alaskan vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,001,213 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.963. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.757% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 757.1 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $42,180, a difference of 26.8%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $99,800, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $98,091, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $50,336, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $37,531, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $58,847, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 69.8%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 62.6%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 17.5%), single father poverty (22.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 56.4%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 53.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 49.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.73%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 39.1%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 37.8%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 25.4%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.3%).