Immigrants from Ecuador vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,023,642 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 57.2 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 26.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $58,847, a difference of 8.9%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $99,800, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($44,462 compared to $45,197, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($80,341 compared to $82,029, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $91,668, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.18%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 33.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.2%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.41%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 238.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 73.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 22.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 68.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 89.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.7%), and college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.19%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%).