Latvian vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,506,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 100.6 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 15.1%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $62,848, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $46,556, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $63,382, a difference of 0.18%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $108,457, a difference of 0.43%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $119,262, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 32.8%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.7%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.30%), family households (62.8% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 78.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.050%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.73%).