Immigrants from England vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,649,078 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.976. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.194% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 194.3 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 15.2%), median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $46,556, a difference of 12.8%), and per capita income ($48,844 compared to $54,202, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $112,008, a difference of 2.3%), median household income ($92,098 compared to $95,098, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $62,848, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 29.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.17%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.1%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 18.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (64.4% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 100.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 51.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 45.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.6%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 44.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%).