Laotian vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Soviet Union

Good
Good
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,677,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.890. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.169% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 168.9 Soviet Union.
Laotian Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Laotian vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $54,202, a difference of 15.2%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $46,556, a difference of 10.5%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($94,990 compared to $95,098, a difference of 0.11%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $112,008, a difference of 0.86%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $55,340, a difference of 1.8%).
Laotian vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricLaotianSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Exceptional
24.2%

Laotian vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Laotian vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianSoviet Union
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.1%

Laotian vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Laotian vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianSoviet Union
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Laotian vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.93%).
Laotian vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Good
83.0%

Laotian vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.3%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.52%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.6%).
Laotian vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianSoviet Union
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
26.3%

Laotian vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 92.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 66.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 10.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 51.7%).
Laotian vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.4%

Laotian vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.2%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Laotian vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.5%

Laotian vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 29.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.64%), disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Laotian vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricLaotianSoviet Union
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Fair
2.5%