French Canadian vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

French Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

French Canadians

Soviet Union

Average
Good
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in French Canadian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,221,337 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 27.8 Soviet Union.
French Canadian Integration in Soviet Union Communities

French Canadian vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $54,202, a difference of 26.0%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $46,556, a difference of 21.1%), and median earnings ($46,026 compared to $54,290, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $55,340, a difference of 5.1%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $62,848, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $112,008, a difference of 13.0%).
French Canadian vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricFrench CanadianSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,003
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,634
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,810
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,026
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,722
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,436
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,672
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,694
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,093
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,975
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
24.2%

French Canadian vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 30.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.73%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
French Canadian vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricFrench CanadianSoviet Union
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Excellent
11.1%

French Canadian vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 68.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 45.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
French Canadian vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFrench CanadianSoviet Union
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

French Canadian vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 38.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
French Canadian vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFrench CanadianSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Good
83.0%

French Canadian vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.9%), births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 30.8%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.07 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (48.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (63.7% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
French Canadian vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFrench CanadianSoviet Union
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.07
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.3%

French Canadian vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 122.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 49.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 45.2%).
French Canadian vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFrench CanadianSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
4.4%

French Canadian vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 63.5%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
French Canadian vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricFrench CanadianSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.2%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.9%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.5%

French Canadian vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 98.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
French Canadian vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricFrench CanadianSoviet Union
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%