Immigrants from South America vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,420,242 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,068 compared to $54,202, a difference of 23.0%), median family income ($100,414 compared to $119,262, a difference of 18.8%), and median male earnings ($53,962 compared to $63,382, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $55,340, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $62,848, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.38%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.98%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 54.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 41.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.1%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 29.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.62%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.1%).