Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Laos

Soviet Union

Fair
Good
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,184,695 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.865. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.324% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 323.9 Soviet Union.
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $54,202, a difference of 43.2%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $119,262, a difference of 29.3%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $63,382, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $55,340, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $62,848, a difference of 10.8%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LaosSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,857
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,239
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,327
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,884
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,190
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,841
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,041
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,553
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,909
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,722
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Exceptional
24.2%

Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 28.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 11.8%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LaosSoviet Union
Poverty
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
11.1%

Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LaosSoviet Union
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 29.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LaosSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.6%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 49.7%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.1% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (45.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.11, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LaosSoviet Union
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.0%
Exceptional
26.3%

Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 113.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 74.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 57.9%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LaosSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
4.4%

Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 102.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 80.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 80.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LaosSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.7%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.5%

Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 40.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LaosSoviet Union
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.5%