Immigrants from South Africa vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,378,470 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.983. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 70.4 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 17.7%), median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $46,556, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $55,340, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($95,800 compared to $95,098, a difference of 0.74%), median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $63,382, a difference of 0.77%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,886 compared to $112,008, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.88%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.4%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (48.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households (63.7% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 77.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 37.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.9%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and high school diploma (91.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.76%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%).