Filipino vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Filipinos

Soviet Union

Exceptional
Good
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Filipino Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,500,201 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 24.9 Soviet Union.
Filipino Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Filipino vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 22.7%), householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $62,848, a difference of 22.0%), and median household income ($115,509 compared to $95,098, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $55,340, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $46,556, a difference of 6.3%), and per capita income ($59,066 compared to $54,202, a difference of 9.0%).
Filipino vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricFilipinoSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$59,066
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$138,397
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$115,509
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$61,197
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,224
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,508
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,740
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,723
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$134,910
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$76,686
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
24.2%

Filipino vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 49.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (10.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.9%).
Filipino vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricFilipinoSoviet Union
Poverty
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.3%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.4%
Excellent
11.1%

Filipino vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Filipino vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFilipinoSoviet Union
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Filipino vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Filipino vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFilipinoSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.4%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Good
83.0%

Filipino vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.6% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and married-couple households (51.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.46%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (49.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.7%).
Filipino vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFilipinoSoviet Union
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.0%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.7%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
26.3%

Filipino vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 67.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 56.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 46.6%).
Filipino vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFilipinoSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
4.4%

Filipino vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.5%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Filipino vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricFilipinoSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.5%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
75.5%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
52.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
23.4%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.4%
Exceptional
2.5%

Filipino vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.0%), ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and female disability (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Filipino vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricFilipinoSoviet Union
Disability
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.5%