Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Soviet Union
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Soviet Union
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Soviet Union Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,396,656 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 34.0 Soviet Union.
Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $54,202, a difference of 48.6%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $119,262, a difference of 39.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $108,457, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 12.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,848, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,340, a difference of 23.6%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Soviet Union |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $54,202 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $119,262 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $95,098 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $54,290 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $63,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $46,556 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $55,340 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $108,457 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $112,008 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,848 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.2% |
Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.6%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 42.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 17.4%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Soviet Union |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Soviet Union |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Poor 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Soviet Union |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Average 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 83.0% |
Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.90%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Soviet Union |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 60.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 24.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Fair 46.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 26.3% |
Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 121.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 68.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 11.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Soviet Union |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 17.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 82.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 45.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 95.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Soviet Union |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 71.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 55.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 84.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 74.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Soviet Union |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 0.95% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.5% |