Immigrants from Uruguay vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,261,947 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.914. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 60.9 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $54,202, a difference of 23.2%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $119,262, a difference of 21.4%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $63,382, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $55,340, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $62,848, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.33%), currently married (45.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 46.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.9%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%).