Chinese vs Brazilian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Brazilian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Brazilians
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Brazilian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,555,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 37.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 14.2% |
| Range | 16.7% | 13.0% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 5.4% |
| Median | 3.3% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Albanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |