Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,200,933 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 20.3 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $98,267, a difference of 19.5%), and per capita income ($39,529 compared to $46,700, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $61,465, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $40,483, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($43,416 compared to $48,356, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.6%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (61.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.15%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.6%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%).