Icelander vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Icelanders

Brazilians

Good
Good
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in Icelander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,316,455 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.425% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 424.7 Brazilians.
Icelander Integration in Brazilian Communities

Icelander vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $54,335, a difference of 6.0%), per capita income ($44,987 compared to $46,700, a difference of 3.8%), and median household income ($85,797 compared to $88,934, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $61,465, a difference of 0.32%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $104,408, a difference of 2.1%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $106,942, a difference of 2.5%).
Icelander vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricIcelanderBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$44,987
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Good
$104,282
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Good
$85,797
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Good
$46,916
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,415
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,109
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,247
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,560
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,261
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,270
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
26.7%

Icelander vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 15.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and female poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Icelander vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricIcelanderBrazilian
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Good
11.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Good
11.0%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.1%

Icelander vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Icelander vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIcelanderBrazilian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%

Icelander vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Icelander vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIcelanderBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.7%

Icelander vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Icelander vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIcelanderBrazilian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Excellent
30.4%

Icelander vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.60%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.9%).
Icelander vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIcelanderBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.4%

Icelander vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.2%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
Icelander vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricIcelanderBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.5%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%

Icelander vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Icelander vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricIcelanderBrazilian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%