Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guamanians/Chamorros

Brazilians

Fair
Good
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,602,611 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 161.5 Brazilians.
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Brazilian Communities

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $46,700, a difference of 12.0%), median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $56,837, a difference of 5.9%), and median family income ($101,061 compared to $106,942, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $54,335, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $61,465, a difference of 2.8%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.9%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,678
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,061
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Good
$86,255
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,933
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,661
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,717
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,423
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,569
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,170
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,187
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
26.7%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.82%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBrazilian
Poverty
Good
12.1%
Good
11.9%
Families
Good
8.8%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Good
11.0%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Good
13.3%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Excellent
11.1%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBrazilian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Average
5.3%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.7%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.7%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.8%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.4%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBrazilian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.6%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Excellent
30.4%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 33.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 30.1%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.5%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.2%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
5.4%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.060%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBrazilian
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%