New Zealander vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Brazilians

Excellent
Good
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,759,081 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.327. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.116% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 115.6 Brazilians.
New Zealander Integration in Brazilian Communities

New Zealander vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $61,465, a difference of 9.6%), per capita income ($50,575 compared to $46,700, a difference of 8.3%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $106,942, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $54,335, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $40,483, a difference of 4.9%).
New Zealander vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
26.7%

New Zealander vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
New Zealander vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderBrazilian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Good
11.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
11.1%

New Zealander vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
New Zealander vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderBrazilian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%

New Zealander vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.72%).
New Zealander vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Exceptional
83.7%

New Zealander vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.94%), and family households (62.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
New Zealander vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderBrazilian
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Excellent
30.4%

New Zealander vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
New Zealander vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.4%

New Zealander vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
New Zealander vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

New Zealander vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
New Zealander vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderBrazilian
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%