Central American vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Central American
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Central Americans

Brazilians

Poor
Good
1,952
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
278th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in Central American Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 314,700,266 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Brazilians.
Central American Integration in Brazilian Communities

Central American vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,560 compared to $46,700, a difference of 21.1%), median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $56,837, a difference of 18.2%), and median family income ($91,087 compared to $106,942, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $54,335, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $61,465, a difference of 9.1%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $40,483, a difference of 10.9%).
Central American vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricCentral AmericanBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,560
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,087
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,803
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,280
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,093
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,492
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,626
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,144
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,321
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.1%
Tragic
26.7%

Central American vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Central American vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricCentral AmericanBrazilian
Poverty
Tragic
14.6%
Good
11.9%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
16.0%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.5%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.6%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Excellent
16.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.1%

Central American vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Central American vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCentral AmericanBrazilian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Central American vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Central American vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCentral AmericanBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.7%

Central American vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.1%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.68%), family households (66.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Central American vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCentral AmericanBrazilian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.0%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.1%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.3%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Excellent
30.4%

Central American vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Central American vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCentral AmericanBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.2%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
5.4%

Central American vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 64.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.6%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Central American vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricCentral AmericanBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.4%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.1%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
88.4%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.2%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.1%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Central American vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Central American vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricCentral AmericanBrazilian
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%